Sunday, June 21, 2009

Paranoia

Paranoia






    "I know the world's been sheared by a drunken barber and I don't need anybody to tell me," says Walter Brennan in Frank Capra's Meet John Doe.  Surely the faulty pretenses of the Iraq war with its ever changing reasons for why we attacked or the amount of political posturing for pork barrel spending leave all of us except the most foolish feeling a bit queasy.  Dietrich Bonhoeffer, in my opinion the greatest theologian of the twentieth century, put it this way:

We have been silent witnesses of evil deeds: we have been drenched by many storms; we have learnt the arts of equivocation and pretence; experience has made us suspicious of others and kept us from being truthful and open; intolerable conflicts have worn us down and even made us cynical. Are we still of any use?

I suppose when faced with lies and deceit, the subtle wearing away of our consciences and the endless deals even the best of us make with ourselves just to get through one day; a better world can seem so far removed from this ever present hell we inhabit.  This leaves us either docile or angry.
    I know the anger.  The ever present urge to break free from the dogmas that envelop us so much that we feel we are suffocating just by being alive.  

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

The words of Dylan Thomas seem so real and true to many of us about life as well as death.  We live with a rage against death and a rage against life so much that we live with both of them deep inside of us.  We don't even know that we are all poisoned.
    I was talking with a person at a local bookstore today about politics and the other subjects that one is not supposed to discuss in general (you know, all the fun things).  He began discussing how America was trying to influence Iran by keeping the media talking about Iran.1 He said it was a CIA2 and State Department plot.  (He is not alone, apparently the clerics in charge of Iran also believe this.)  It seems where ever we go these days we hear the same stuff.  We hear about such and so spinning a story, and no doubt this happens; but what is intolerable is the outright conspiracy theories.
    Quite possibly one of the best conspiracies is that we went to Iraq for oil.  This is a simple answer to a complex question.  Oil is inevitably linked to money, but money in and of itself is not something that is desirable.  Rather money is a form of order and to obtain more order means that you are winning a game.  The thing many people miss is that there are more forms of order that people will follow.  There are things like pride or ego that lead to actions just as disagreeable as the reckless pursuit of money and power.  Now I am sure that oil played a role, but the real reason was obviously hurt pride because Daddy Bush didn't finish the job of deposing the resident dictator of Iraq.3  
    However, what really made me write this blog post was something I saw while watching The Best Years of Our Lives, one of the finest pictures of the year 1946.  The movie follows three servicemen who are trying to readjust to life after the war.  At one point a man begins to commiserate with a sailor who has lost his hands.  Then he tells him that the entire war had been a falsehood and certain powers had orchestrated the entire endeavor for their own selfish reasons.  This is more than two of the service men can handle and they lay the guy out.
    The point in this blog post, and yes it has a point, is that life is far more nuanced than we would like it to be; and sometimes that nuance is in a cruel and simple answer that has little root in webs of reasons and large scale organizations.  JFK was killed by a lone gunman, September 11th was not orchestrated by the CIA, there is nothing at the bottom of Loch Ness, and allergies in America are not the plot of the evil Kleenex company.  (I am willing to be proven wrong when the evidence surfaces.)  I suppose the humoresque nature of such things would be benign except for the fact that they get in the way of any real work being done, just as a television show which we would never watch in a million years keeps us from mowing the lawn or writing a paper.  The things that are less than inconsequential destroy our reality and begin to weigh us down.
    In addition to this it poisons our notions of humanity.  I admit to being repulsed by order for order's sake, but I do love the notion that human beings create order as a tool.  When we do not trust our government as a tool or our businesses as tools; we are rejecting a part of our human nature.  We are choosing to be animals rather than rational beings.  In addition to this we denigrate our fellow humans by saying we are more incorruptible and more pure and made of better stuff than they are be they bankers or bureaucrats.
    Lastly, people mess up or let something leak.  I have never known of any secret that can last as long as our conspiracy theories.  Human nature will let the truth leak out eventually.  People are not machines, they are flesh and blood and usually stupid errors are the cause of great catastrophes just as planned and organized terror are as well.  The lone gunmen wreak more havoc many times than the organization of great powers.  To look for unavailable motives to back up our audacious theories is in the same vein of stupidity.
    I am not a Pollyanna, I have heard the spin of fools and mortals who try and back up their ludicrous actions with spurious justification.  I have heard a great deal and read a great deal.  However, America and capitalism and the government are not the things to fear; as one person once said, "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance."  As a recovering phobo-phobic, I would say that is pretty good advice for the paranoids to heed.
    



  1. As if the media needs an excuse for a good story.  I can just hear John Meacham of Newsweek trying to decide the merits of covering a story about a country known for its anti-democratic tenor and totalitarian tendencies which is in a state of near meltdown as its monsters finally come up from years of sewn dragon's teeth.  "No, I just cannot cover this story, it would not be fair to the good people of Iran to cover the news."  Yeah, the Obama administration had to work really hard to keep this story alive.
  2. Unlike many people who talk about the CIA, I have actually studied the history of the organization.  I have many facts about it.  For instance: Did you know the CIA was not founded by demons or that its primary goal was not to destroy countries or that many times it was the people's will that forced it to so many of the things for which it is criticized.  First off, it was created to beam in news from the Western World into Eastern Europe and Russia via organizations called Radio Free Europe and Radio Freedom respectively.  Secondly, when given the task of toppling the elected government of Chile during the Nixon administration, the CIA was vociferously against such an action.  It was in fact planned by people within ... wait for it ... the Nixon administration (most notably Henry Kissinger).  Go figure.
  3. I suppose that replacing one conspiracy theory with another one is not the appropriate way to go about things, but my justification is this: First, Hussein is out of power and we have no oil revenues (nor did it ever look like we would get any in the first place, only liberal ideologues thought that might happen).  Secondly, I do not believe it is a conspiracy theory because the answers are so manifest and most of the public knows the reasons anyway.  Concurrently it should be mentioned that all of us (except for a few that marched against the war) were of the opinion that it was the right thing to do.  Nancy Pelosi, George Bush, and yours truly all kept silent and backed the war de facto if not out right.  I kept silent.  I did not march.  I didn't think it would happen.  I should have made sure.  But the hypocrisy of the Americans who say they were lied to is both inexcusable and intolerable.  Admit you were wrong and then work to fix this mess.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Among the Fragments of Life.

Among the Fragments of Life.





    I just got back from a mission trip down in Tennessee.  I am tired and a bit hungry and I suppose that things will make sense tomorrow afternoon.  In Western Culture there is a phrase about coming down from a mountain-top experience.  We have seen the face of God or witnessed some sort of epiphany and all of a sudden the clouds come and its just us again.  Its hard when that mountain-top experience never really comes and you are plunged into a deeper valley.  I combed the myriad of e-mails and found most of them to be spam or unrelated threads of thoughts thrown into the universe.  (I suppose that is what this blog post is as well.)  I deposited money into a bank account that has been much depleted from various trips and malnourished with my measly pay-check.  My computer screen is full of half-started starts of stories where the perfect words seem to escape me.  Life is full of imperfection and we just say, "Get over it.  Move on."
    To a degree these people are right.  We cannot just stay still and immobilized, but neither should we accept the fact that our lives are fragmented and fractured.  Too often they lie broken and disheartened.  Maybe that is just my life and I am projecting it on others.  There is a sad chord humming through the course of our lives.  It never goes away and it gives some sort of importance to our existence that would be missing otherwise.  I try and cure it or ignore it or "move on", but it never goes away.  I wonder if others are afraid to talk about it: this sadness.  The sad feeling of coming down into the dirt and dust and muck and mire of a world that seems so frankly indifferent about our survival that it borders on cruel.
    This is the world of the atheist and this is the world of the Christian.  These two people exist in the same world.  I suppose I'm a lost cause.  I have tried so hard to free myself from fear.  I can't do it.  I lose my old faith daily and each day I have to keep coming back to a new vision.  How I wish I could throw away my faith in God, but the alternative cannot exist in my worldview.  I wish this world was a place where I didn't have to answer to anyone at all.  I wish this world was a place where I would be pat on the back because I, by my own initiative and power did good and resisted evil.  I wish I were God.1
    But I can't.  I would like to stay in my room all day and work a dead-end job and read books.  I would like an easy victory with no work.  I just can't do it though.  I am not strong enough and so I join the legions of failures; the group of people that Nietszche said had destroyed the world by stifling the Übermensch and creating a world where the dregs of society end up on top.  I am a Christian.  Why do I keep coming back to this problem?  Why can't I let it go?
    In order to be anything you must go back to square one all the time.  I suppose we never outgrow numbers no matter how far into math we descend.  My reason is this.  I gave up the thing I loved most.  I gave up trying to have all the answers and worry if people think I am smart.  I stopped trying to predict my future.2  I just gave up.  And I gave up worrying about my timing.  I stopped getting angry that I had not reached a point where I thought I should be.  I gave up listening to a lot of things.  The point is, I take things a lot less seriously because I take life a lot more seriously.  I am not what I am.  I am a lot of broken fragments that don't know where I fit.  Big deal.  Walk away.  Stop being perfect.  Just be human ... be what I am created to be.
    And so, I just got back from Tennessee.  I think I will take care of a few things, get some water and read.  I think a deserve to take a break from worrying about things I didn't do wrong and can't control.  Mazel Tov.




  1. Yes, I said it Spencer.  I would also like to see how many other people out there believe they have a "God complex."
  2. Oh sure, I do it still.  Its my personality.  I am built that way.  It is my blessing/curse; that strange aspect of your humanity that is both your attribute and achilles heel.  I am a know-it-all, but I have to make sure that I am never defined by it and sprawling on a pin under the heading: A prime example of a know-it-all.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Coins

Coins

I was recently watching the History channel, which ironically is something I never do.  (I am serious, it is never really about history is it?)  On an episode of Modern Marvels they were talking about money production in the United States.  Apparently Hamilton had wanted bank notes to be the main legal tender, while Jefferson wanted coinage.  Really quick, what do we usually use?  Sure we have coins for the smaller amounts, but come on, we use bills ... or bank notes.

Now, for many of you who know me, you know that I think Jefferson was lucky enough to be floating along with the right people.  If the British had won the revolution, it is pretty safe to say Jefferson would probably have survived just fine.  However, Hamilton was a republican to the hilt.  He realized that economic development could never reach its full potential under a strict state control.  So, he had a lot invested in the success of a republican-based federal government.

However, if you were going to put coin production under a particular cabinet who would you pick: the state department or the treasury department?  That's right: the state department.  Why?  I have no clue.  But we had coin production and the banks had decentralized bank note printing.1  Eventually we switched over to bank notes and Hamilton's idea was implement almost three-quarters (no pun intended) of a century later.  Once again, the legacy of Jefferson haunted future generations.

What does all this mean for us today?  A centralized government is a necessity, not an impediment.  Government, as Russell Shorto would have it, is only one part of civilization just as the individual, religion, and business are.  If you do not view your life as made up of symbiotic composites, you will end up becoming a paranoid fool or at the whims of paranoid fools.  What causes this is quite simply fear.  Fear is purely emotional, but disguises itself as reason.  It is important to understand the aspects of our human experiment and not to fear them or rage against them.


  1. There were about 7,000 different bank notes circulating around the United States at this time.  Oh, and you didn't know if they were still viable in one place or another.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Fairy Tales

Two Peoples of America





    The most realistic fictions are the ones that do not seem most realistic, but rather the ones that gives us what we want most.  In America, grace given for free, is anathema.  Neither left-wing Christians nor right-wing Christians wish to embrace what the German Theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer called "costly grace."  The left wishes to demonstrate its benovolence through its "good works" while the right wishes to prove its grace through its "economic gifts."  Both miss the point that Christianity is not about what you get out of it.  It is a world view in the purest sense precisely because it resists the things it can get out of the world and accepts the blessings of a good day and the suffering of a bad day with the same joy.  It is absurd, I know, but those who argue that absurdity is a reason to discount it, miss the point that life itself is absurd and dictated by the absurd.  However, I am not arguing Christianity right now, but rather the fairy tales created by the right and left in order to ignore their Christian heritage.

    I voted for President Obama, lets get that on the table right now.  I believe he is a good "American."  And by this I mean he is a pragmatist who is willing to reach concessions and willing to try anything that might conceivably get us out of this financial dilemma.  He has the country's best interest at heart and it probably wouldn't matter if he were Christian, Muslim, Atheist, or whatever; his first loyalty is to the country.  So, when certain segments of society criticize him for not being Christian enough; I respond, "We probably wouldn't like that too much if he were."  Mr. Obama was not elected to be the "high priest" or "pontifax maximus" of the United States.  He was elected to be the president of the United States of America.  If he were elected to be the bishop of a synod or the pastor of my church; then I would not have voted for him to hold this office.  His views on Christianity are very "works-based" righteousness and it wouldn't take any great theological master work to punch holes in his viewpoints.
    I bring up Mr. Obama not to discredit him, but to highlight two very important points.  Firstly, in America, the separation of church and state is not only something beneficial to our survival; it is actually something quite deeply rooted in our Christian heritage.  From Jesus saying, "give to Caesar what is Caesar's (the state) and give to God what is God's (the church)" all the way through Augustinian and Lutheran notions about the "Kingdom of the Right and Kingdom of the Left."  Christians work within the state and follow the state's rules, but adhere to further dictums of their religious affiliation.  The two come in conflict a great deal less than critics believe.  Mr. Obama's faith and his reason for what he does are not mine.  He is not Lutheran.  His speeches are to deal with finances, the environment, and the Constitutionality of such-and-such; not on the theological aspects of free-will v. determinism or the Trinity.  He has a job, his own brand of Christianity informs him of it; but I am not looking to him for theological insight and I highly recommend that you do not either.
    The second point that I would like to make is that his Christianity is one that I find to be flawed.  It expects that works are the cause rather than the fruits of grace.  His decisions and his involvement allow him to have a good cache in the Bank of Heaven.  He was fortunate enough that his politics was able to accept Christianity; and that he could get by with a little work's based righteousness.  This is anathema to the good Lutheran, who, though we do good works, see it as a gift rather than an obligation.  To many leftist Christians any "good work" is seen as the ultimate sign of faith and even trumps the Christian who "doesn't do enough good works."  I don't know who is going to get into heaven, Jesus doesn't know who is going to get to heaven, and Barack Obama doesn't know who is going to get into heaven (and he has the good sense to keep quiet about it).
    The right on the other hand seem to leave their faith at the door when they pursue their issues.  Gay marriage and anti-abortion and (I don't know how) the tax code; become enmeshed not in their Christian world-view, but in their Pharisaical desire to be "right."  To them the issue is paramount and their faith is secondary.  They have a fervor that is not found in anyone in the New Testament except Saul of Tarsus before he saw the light.  And so, when someone comes to the table with viewpoints they do not particularly care for, they do not argue the point but attack the issue.  Dialogue cannot continue in that environment.  However it is more important to know that Christ befriended the extortionists, the prostitutes, and whoever else would listen to him.  He didn't do it to prove some point and he never accepted their excuses for why they did what they did; but to him the message of God's saving love was more important than some political plank.  I wonder how many we needlessly alienate by not trying to figure out how God went missing in someone's life and how we can be like Philip and say "come and see."  Instead the right is trying to legalize morals and ignoring that the law was fulfilled by Christ.  We are not free from the law or tax codes or obligations to the state by Christ's death, but we are free to share the good news.  That's what it means, and so much more.
    The fictions of the religious right and the religious left are so desirable because they require us to be in charge.  They allow us to delegate and regulate good works or morals.  They don't allow the Holy Spirit and God to be at the center of our lives and so they should be disregarded as fairy tales that we ignore now that we are older.  Our faith in God is bigger than our faith in the state or even in our own determinism.  Our grace should be the determining factor in our lives.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Summer in Ohio

Summer in Ohio

    Its finally summer time in Central Ohio.  The sky is gray and filled with rain and people have been working on lawns and house projects.  The tulips and daffodils finished blooming a while ago and now it is time for the irises and daylilies to finish their cycle.  A talk with a good friend of mine by the name of Spencer Troxell reminded me of something my dad said a long time ago.  Spencer asked if I was being to harsh on people what with my criticisms; and that reminded me of how my dad said he was going to avoid writing anything nasty on his blog.1
    While none of us should be Pollyannas with rose-colored glasses and happy mindless babble; I think I have spent far too much time in the stuffy ivory towers of human perfection.  When I say that we humans have issues and problems, its nothing new.  The problem is that many of us can get so frustrated that the world is not the way it should be, that we often sound angry.  Our idealized world becomes more important the world around us.  We forget to look at people as people.2
    So as I stare out my windows and onto the world around me and think of tomorrow and its promises of a good walk with a friend of mine, I think that maybe I am not taking life seriously enough.  The serious fact that I didn't make a beautiful day and if I didn't, than maybe it was created for me to enjoy.
    



  1. An almost herculean effort to be sure in this day and age of foaming-at-the-mouth-ideologues.
  2. I was going to argue this point in this blog post, but it seems more appropriate to argue it in a footnote where it won't disturb the flow of the rest of my post and it will fulfill the requirement for my response.  Mr. Troxell pointed out that I was too hard on humanity and that we have god complexes.  He is right.  I believe we all want to be, not just the hero of our story, but the gods as well.  Whether that is good or bad is up to you and your philosophy.    I believe I am too hard on people because we ignore just how wonderful it is to be human.  Here is a bit of a paradox because in my criticism I am actually ignoring their humanity which has built into the capability of doing monumentally stupid things, but also can look up at the stars in wonder.  It is pretty amazing that no matter who we are, we all seem to look up at the stars in wonder.  I get frustrated when people just don't think too much, but I think way too much for anybody.  I suppose that is projection of desires for people to think more about what they do.  Big deal, its my way.

        I also was told I didn't have to write so much, but I like to write.  So whatever.

Monday, June 1, 2009

You Can Stop Whining Now

You Can Stop Whining Now





    Everyone does it.  Its second nature really.  I have family members who do it.  My best friends do it.  Heck, I do it all the time.  It is America's favorite past time and is far more popular than football or baseball or pizza or the latest iPhone.  Yes, folks its whining.  And now that I come think about it, it is something so universal that Americans can't claim it as just their own.  Which reminds me, "Why are all these foreigners whining as much as us?  We're the best whiners in the world."



    Now I know that just like war and the poor and reality television, whining will always be with us.  Its human nature, so the story goes.  I also know my little blog post is not going to stop me from whining.  And if it doesn't stop me, than it certainly will not stop you.  What kind of hypocrite would I be, then?1  However, every time I start complaining I do make a mental note of what I am doing.  I weigh very carefully the stupid problem I am having with the fact that I am a middle class American, and that alone tends to stop me in my tracks.2
    However, I think whining is one of the most crucial subjects to talk about when discussing religion.  It may even be more important than the problem of evil and is certainly more important than the number of angels which routinely find it enjoyable to dance upon the head of a pin.3  Yes, without facing the fact that we love to whine when we talk about religion is fundamental.
    I'll give you a few examples.  I have a good friend who, while discussing religion on a car ride said, "Dawkins was right."4
    "How so?" I asked.
    "He said that if another religion is attacked by an atheist, the Christian will always back the other religion."
    Another time a coworker stated that atheists were the most hated segment of society.5
    One of my friends from high school is lamenting that "the government" is systematically trying to remove religion from school systems via "evolution."
    What do all of these statements have in common?  The answer is whining.  Are we a nation that believes what we believe so that it will get us special advantages?  Do we join groups to because we want to be well-liked or highly esteemed?  Or do we join a group because we believe and maybe even think, that it makes the most sense?
    For human beings whining gets down to that most dangerous of human problems: pride.  When we whine about our fair share, what we are really saying is that it is not fair that you do not think like me.  We are wanting ourselves to be the free-thinking god of the universe and every other person to be a mindless automaton.6  And I think this is something that we Christians and Muslims and Buddhists and maybe even the atheists (if they want to join), can agree upon.
    I find it in myself though.  I can't understand why Christians aren't as interested in their philosophical heritage or why my non-theist friends just don't agree with me.  It isn't for me to worry about though and it certainly isn't for me to whine about.  There are too many issues that really need calmly and logically to be addressed without me feeling persecuted.  
    This is, I guess, the crux of my argument.  We all feel persecuted, perhaps we are (albeit in a blunted American way).  We all feel as if our opinions are overlooked or ridiculed and we all have a perverse desire to "be right."  Instead we have to ask ourselves "Am I angry because I am not being taken seriously or because my position is being ridiculed?"  If our position is being ridiculed than either humanity or God will take care of the problem.  If it is because we are being ridiculed, than maybe we should rethink why we took up the position in the first place.
    Atheists and Theists too often wear their believes as badges of honor and do not realize the humility involved with being chosen to take up their particular cause.  I did not become a Christian because I wanted power, or money, or fame, or because it was easy, or because I am stupid.  I became a Christian for reasons I do not know and because of answers I cannot even begin to fathom.  I think that others chose their viewpoints for quite the same reason; or perhaps they are chosen by their viewpoints.  When we shed ourselves of our own pride and fruitless struggling, we find the sad truth; "we are all beggars."  Then we are happy for it at last and we realize we have no more reason to whine.




  1. The Answer:  An human being.
  2. Albeit briefly.  I am an human being after all.
  3. The answer is 42.  Deep Thought II hasn't reached this point yet.  Aquinas hit upon it somewhere in his Summa ... Whatever.  The dude wrote like eighty books because he was a freakin' monk.  I mean, imagine one long toilet break and multiply that by like a billion and you are roughly in the ballpark for the kind of time monks had on their hands in the middle ages.  When they got bored they created hospitals and eventually beer, but churning out eighty some volumes on every question that enters your I've-just-finished-my-umpteenth-ninety-nine-bottles-of-beer-on-the-wall-in-thirteenth-century-latin marathon is a pretty decent achievement.
  4. Starting off a thought with something that from the outset is illogical is probably not a good thing.
  5. Actually no.  In my book atheists trail stop light algorithm programmers.
  6. As a Christian I would argue that if there is a God, he is comfortable enough in His skin to allow us some degree of freedom.  Even though He is perfect and free-thinking, He is comfortable with non-automatons.